Skip to main content

Day 70 (4/28): Science Articles Jigsaw Discussion


Part 1: Article Groups

For the first 20-25 minutes of class, you will come together with others who have read the same article as you.  During this time, you should work to deepen your understanding of the text, compare your impressions, and consider its implications for your understanding of Science as an Area of Knowledge.  

  • Using the Knowledge Framework for Natural Sciences, consider how your articles address questions of Scope, Perspective, Methods & Tools, and Ethics. 
  • Don't attempt to answer ALL the questions from any of these sections. Instead, consider WHICH of the questions seem to resonate most with the arguments and ideas in your article.
  • As you talk, create a set of collaborative notes, with questions and tentative answers, using a template like the one below, that you can take with you to Part II of this activity.



Part II: Jigsaw Discussion

Next, you will be placed into a group with students who have become experts on a different one of the assigned texts. Here, you will act as the “resident expert” on your text.  

Begin by talking through your text with this group--give them the short version of your own understanding of the text, as well as the understandings you reached with your first group.  Take turns with this, but let it be a conversation (if you see connections, interrupt one another)

Once you think you have made some sense of the texts and how they interrelate, pick one question from the list of TOK Exhibition Prompts and construct a visual representation that captures the tensions that exist within and between your texts as it relates to the prompt.  

Your representation MUST include:
  • The TOK Exhibition Prompt you have chosen to investigate
  • Drawings that are literal in nature (that is, that represent some real world object or thing that is connected to the texts or your discussion of them.
  • Drawings that are figurative in nature (that is, that represent objects whose connection is metaphorical or analogic or symbolic)
  • Words and phrases (i.e., quotes) from the texts themselves that are key to understanding the question under investigation.
  • Other Key Words or Phrases that feel especially relevant to your understanding of the question, the texts, or the Natural Sciences more broadly.
Your representation should also include the physical contributions of all members in more or less equal balance.  That means no fair designating one person to draw the poster--all hands on deck.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Day 64 (3/7) Intro to Ethics: The Trolley Problem

   Let's begin by watching the following videos, explaining the famous "Trolley Problem", a thought experiment to demonstrate some key ethical dilemmas: After you watch the video, think and discuss: How would you behave in the first example?  What motivates this decision? How about in the revised example?  What, if any, difference is there in your reaction?  What creates this difference? What other modifications to the problem can you come up with that would focus the dilemma in other interesting ways? Finally, this dilemma is not realistic, but we should think about real-world instances of "trolley problem" thinking at work.  Here's one of  my recent favorites . (other take  here  and  here ) This TedEd Video offers some historical and social context to this problem. And now you smart enough to get this Existential Comics cartoon:

Day 59 (3/22): The Black Box Problem

"What's in the box?!" -Brad Pitt   Let's begin our discussion of science with a quick POP QUIZ!!! After you are done, put your quiz someplace safe.  We'll come back to it soon to check your initial understanding. Now, we will try some hands on science with my favorite TOK activity: THE  BLACK BOX  PROBLEM I will put you in teams of 3-4 students.  Together, you will work together to discover the nature of the universe. Please follow along on  these instructions  as I explain.